Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
COUNTERPOINT: Bipartisanship isn’t dead; it just takes political courage

COUNTERPOINT: Bipartisanship isn’t dead; it just takes political courage

  • Updated
  • 0
{{featured_button_text}}

President Joe Biden promised a new era of bipartisanship when he was elected, telling media in December that “the nation’s looking for us to be united, much more united.” As any plain observer of the nation’s politics can see, partisan tensions are still sky high.

Bipartisanship isn’t quite dead yet, but a major way that both parties could earn voters’ trust is if they worked together to tackle soaring federal debt and deficits. This may seem counterintuitive, given that the Biden administration has been pointing to strong support in public polls for its big-spending plans. But record levels of federal spending and the budget deficit remain of great concern to voters, and that fact hasn’t changed for a decade.

Gallup most recently reported that nearly half of voters worry a “great deal” about federal spending and the budget deficit. An additional 28% worry a “fair amount,” meaning more than three-quarters of voters are at least somewhat worried. These numbers are down from the public worry in 2011 (when 87% were worried a “great deal” or a “fair amount”) but are high enough that lawmakers should care.

It would be great if lawmakers started by tackling unsustainable growth in mandatory spending (including big-ticket programs like Medicare and Social Security), which makes up 66% of total federal spending in the current fiscal year. These programs are major drivers of spending growth and could be disproportionately responsible for any future debt crisis the nation faces.

Absent a grand bargain on entitlement reform, though, lawmakers must seek smaller but meaningful compromises to reduce the discretionary spending pie that Congress controls. The place to start is the Department of Defense budget.

Why? Defense is the largest single part of the discretionary federal budget, coming in at $715 billion authorized by Congress in the previous fiscal year. Military spending typically makes up more than half of the discretionary budget passed by Congress and is projected to rise to more than $900 billion per year by the end of the decade. And, as is typical with the federal government, military spending is rife with waste, inefficiency and improper allocation of resources.

It’s hard to believe, but responsible and meaningful reductions to the military budget were once a bipartisan venture. President Ronald Reagan presided over real military cuts in four of the eight years of his presidency. In 1985 and '86, Reagan and a divided Congress worked together to enact significant defense cuts of 3.8% and 3.1% respectively (adjusted for inflation), with wide bipartisan margins. The following two years, they agreed to additional, if more modest, cuts.

If Biden and Congress did now exactly what Reagan and Congress did in 1985 or '86, we would be looking at military spending next year near or below $700 billion — still a staggering sum from which we can more than afford to defend the nation — instead of three-quarters of a trillion dollars.

Of course, Reagan first asked for and received large increases during his first term, and his last Defense Department budget was 7.4% higher than his first. But given that the present Pentagon budget has risen 36% in real terms in the last 20 years, some bipartisan reductions — in the model of the 1980s and '90s Reagan, Bush and Clinton cuts — are long overdue, especially as the United States ends 20 years of war. Even a very modest 3% cut from last year’s baseline — less than Reagan cut in both 1985 and 1986 — would mean $10 billion in reductions from Biden’s current Pentagon budget of $715 billion.

If lawmakers and Biden administration officials can muster the courage to take up reductions in the defense budget, where should they start? A cross-ideological group of civil society organizations and budget experts has a roadmap, outlining up to $80 billion in potential reductions for the coming fiscal year alone. They include sensible recommendations like halting additional purchases of the issue-plagued and tremendously expensive F-35 aircraft (savings of $11.4 billion), reducing wasteful service contracting by 15% (savings of $28.5 billion), and canceling the Ford-class aircraft carrier (savings of $12.5 billion per carrier).

Military hawks will complain that cuts will make us less well-positioned to take on foreign adversaries like China and Russia — as they complained about Reagan’s proposed military budgets during the Cold War. But as a former assistant defense secretary to Reagan explained in a recent opinion piece, the U.S. military dwarfs China both in budget size and on numerous other metrics.

Simply put, Congress and the Biden administration can afford to make modest, bipartisan reductions in the defense budget. Big spending is not making us any safer.

President Joe Biden ended talks with a group of Republican senators on a big infrastructure package on Tuesday and started reaching out to senators from both parties in a new effort toward bipartisan compromise, setting a summer deadline for Congress to pass his top legislative priority.The president is walking away from talks with lead Republican negotiator Sen. Shelley Moore Capito after the two spoke Tuesday, but would welcome her in the new bipartisan group, according to an administrative official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the private negotiations.Shortly after the Biden-Capito talks collapsed, 10 senators huddled late Thursday over pizza five Republicans, five Democrats emerging after three hours with some optimism their new effort could create a viable path forward, said a person familiar with the closed-door talks and granted anonymity to discuss them.At the same time, with anxiety running high as time slips by, Democrats are laying the groundwork to pass some or all of the ambitious package on their own. Biden conferred Tuesday with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer about launching the budget resolution process for Senate votes in July, the White House said."The President is committed to moving his economic legislation through Congress this summer, and is pursuing multiple paths to get this done," White House press secretary Jen Psaki said in a statement.The breakdown in the White House's efforts with GOP senators comes after weeks of prolonged infrastructure talks between the president and Capito as the two sides failed to broker the divide over the scope of Biden's sweeping infrastructure investment and how to pay for it.The Republican senators offered a $928 billion proposal, which included about $330 billion in new spending but not as much as Biden's $1.7 trillion investment proposal for rebuilding the nation's roads, bridges, highways and other infrastructure, including Veterans Affairs hospitals and care centers.Biden has proposed raising the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%, a nonstarter for Republicans, and rejected the GOP senators' suggestion of tapping unspent COVID-19 aid money to fund the new infrastructure spending.In a statement, Capito said she was disappointed Biden ended the talks, but also expressed interest in ongoing bipartisan work."While I appreciate President Biden's willingness to devote so much time and effort to these negotiations, he ultimately chose not to accept the very robust and targeted infrastructure package, and instead, end our discussions," she said. "However, this does not mean bipartisanship isn't feasible."The White House confirmed President Biden spoke with Democratic Sens. Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin and Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy yesterday.They're leading a bipartisan group of senators working on their own infrastructure proposal.Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called the bipartisan talks "good" but said it won't be "the only answer.""As a caucus, we will not be able to do all the things the country needs in a totally bipartisan way," Schumer said. "At the same time, we are pursuing the pursuit of reconciliation ... And it may well be that part of the bill thatll pass will be bipartisan, and part of it will be through reconciliation."House Democrats are moving forward on infrastructure.The House transportation and infrastructure committee will mark up a surface transportation bill that includes components of President Biden's American Jobs Plan.Additional reporting by The Associated Press.

Andrew Lautz is the director of federal policy for National Taxpayers Union. He wrote this for InsideSources.com.

0
0
0
0
0

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News

Breaking News (FlagLive!)