Skip to main content
A1 A1

Northern Arizona forward Khiarica Rasheed (15) fights for space to shoot in the paint during a game last season against Idaho in the Walkup Skydome.

alert featured
This year, is there a fright in trick-or-treating itself?

On, that digital back fence where Flagstaff neighbors gather to exchange pleasantries and recipes, to kibitz and air grievances, talk of Halloween has been spirited all month.

As in: Will there even be a Halloween in this pandemic year? Will you dare tempt fate — and possible coronavirus exposure — and let your kids ring doorbells and stick out their candy buckets? Will you seek a semblance of normality and go all out with the spooky yard displays when it’s unsure whether anyone will even show up?

And there’s this, too: Can neighbors reach beyond conversing in the digital realm and band together to organize street parades, block parties and the like? Or is it better, more prudent, just to turn off the porch light and hole up at home on Oct. 31?

From Cheshire to University Heights, Presidio in the Pines to Greenlaw, neighborhood folks are wrestling with these questions. It is certain, though, that the Halloween of 2020 will be vastly different from previous celebrations. After all, this year it’s the people passing out the candy at the front porch who’ll be wearing masks, as well.

Talk has ranged from people using barbecue tongs to drop goodies into trick-or-treater’s bags, to folks constructing elaborate, Rube-Goldberg-like chutes as candy delivery devices, to blocks planning to have kids parade like Mardi Gras revelers and have adults toss the treats at them, to the more tame practice of placing a purple pumpkin at the end of the driveway to clue kids in that this house is taking part with social distancing in place and, thus, is safe to enter.

It has become a heated debate online, with the pro-Halloween faction ardently lobbying for forging ahead, with precautions.

“I shared (on Nextdoor) that I feel very strongly that kids need some normalcy this year more than ever and I wanted to know how everyone else felt about it,” said David Leetham, who lives in University Highlands. “I mentioned a rough idea of how I intended to approach the holiday differently this year and found the vast majority of respondents agreed.

“While I do think there are a fair number of people not taking the threat of COVID-19 seriously, the sense I have from our neighborhood is that most want to participate safely. I suppose I am a little concerned that some parents won't be taking as much care with their kids while trick-or-treating, but we'll do all we can for them. I know there are those who feel this holiday is too risky to participate in and I think that is unfortunate, but to each their own.”

Thinking outside the bag

Leetham has devised a one-way path up his driveway so that the costumed hordes coming and going maintain a safe 6-foot distance in the procession, and he’ll be outside donning a mask and gloves handing out pre-packaged treat bags.

“Our sidewalks will be marked to encourage social distancing, and we'll have themed signs up doing the same and encouraging mask wearing,” he added. “I think we are doing everything we can to make it safe for ourselves and the kids.”

Lest you think Leetham is being too vigilant, his precautions pale compared to other families going all out on the big night.

Sunny Gebler, of University Heights, loves Halloween and enlisted her husband, Hayden, to build a candy chute out of PVC piping that will sit halfway up their long driveway, while the Geblers (including their pet mini-pig, Hank) will sit behind it and feed packs of goodies into mouth of the contraption.

“So kids’ll come up, put their bucket up, ring a little bell and we’ll drop the candy down,” Sunny said. “My husband has painted it and decorated it. He built a little air conditioner and he’ll fill it with dry ice we’ll have some fog floating around. We want to make it fun for the kids.”

Hank, too, will participate. No word on whether the little piggy will be masked up, but he definitely will be dressed up as a pumpkin, and available for trick-or-treaters to take selfies with and feed veggies and pig pellets — because, as Sunny said, Hank should get some goodies, too.

A few Halloween faithful say they’ll press on with plans as much for themselves as for the sake of the kids. Over in Switzer Canyon, Eric Kruse is working on his own delivery device. He hopes it will make people feel safer, but "my gut says there will be a limited amount of trick-or-treaters."

Then there's Deb and Joe Hill, who each year since 2003 have transformed their University Heights home into a haunted house, replete with a spooky pumpkin patch, assorted blowup displays, trees with hanging ghosts, lights both festive and ominous, a witch stirring a frothy cauldron, an old skeleton couple (as opposed to young skeletons?) sitting on the front porch in rocking chairs and sundry spooky sounds.

It takes Joe a month to get everything in place, and Deb says he’s almost finished.

But again, that question: will anyone show up?

Deb isn’t sure, but little matter. “In a normal year, we get about 300 kids, a lot from different neighborhoods,” she said. “Not sure now, but we’ll be sitting on our porch waiting for the trick-or-treaters. We need to get back to some normalcy, and this is a way to do that.”

On Observatory Mesa, where several acres separate houses, Betsy Hamill is accustomed to getting not many (or any) trick-or-treaters. That, however, does not stop her from decorating her house, inside and out, with about six big bins of Halloween nick-knacks. In previous years, she’s hosted Halloween costume parties for friends. This year, COVID-19 has put the kibosh on those plans. Still, Hamill plans to make her home as festive as always.

She has a child of trick-or-treating age and, usually, they repair down the hill to the Cheshire neighborhood to hit some houses and grab some candy.

“This year, it’s still up in the air,” she said. “It’s hard to say what’s going to happen because normally when you drive around you see lots of decorations up, and I’m not seeing that at all, especially in the neighborhood we used to go to. Going up to a door? Not so great.

"The actual thing of trick-or-treating is not necessarily the issue; it’s how close people are getting to each other. It’s more a concern about going to a door. And reaching into a bowl? Not so great, either. I teach at FALA, and a student there has designed a robot that will deliver candy. Pretty cool.”

Precautions and a parade

Jessica Marshall, mother of a 4½-year-old, says she will take her son out to houses that take precautions.

“Most kids will be in masks for their costumes anyway, so as long as adults are wearing masks and or keep their distance, I feel that we can still have a good time while being safe,” Marshall said. “I think this is so important, as these kids have had their worlds turned upside down and have missed out on so much as it is.”

For some, merely making their front yards festive and socially distanced is not enough.

University Heights resident Gabriella Kamahele has been lobbying on Nextdoor for weeks to stage a neighborhood parade. She even surveyed houses in the area to gauge interest. At first, she was rebuffed but, after expressing her disappointment on Nextdoor, others rallied to her cause. Now, there’ll be a procession on the big night, after all, right around twilight.

“We plan a Mardi Gras-style parade,” she said. “It will give those who are at risk for COVID a safe way to distance and yet still be a part of giving out candy … We are encouraging everyone to use tong or toss candy in bags so there is no touching involved.”

Of course, there are always the naysayers, the Halloween version of Christmas Scrooges. As one man who lives in University Heights grumpily wrote on Nextdoor in reply to several posts: “Um, I’m not a Halloween fan so I’ll just eat all my candy and turn off my lights.”

alert top story
Election 2020 series -- Flagstaff City Council: Candidates sound off on COVID and development

With the election just over two weeks away, six candidates are competing for three open seats on the Flagstaff City Council.

Out of this year’s crop of candidates, only one is an incumbent. But if elected, all of them will be helping to guide a city that has found itself in a very different situation than it was in just a few months ago.

Between the election and when candidates declared their intention to run for office, the City of Flagstaff has seen popular protests demand changes to police funding, and a pandemic and economic downturn that has not only diminished many of the organization's revenue streams but has left many local businesses and residents struggling.

Despite the position technically being nonpartisan, it is notable that every single one of the candidates is a member of the Democratic Party, especially given it was only four years ago that the council had a conservative majority.

Jim McCarthy, the only city council candidate running for reelection, was part of that 2016 progressive wave that replaced the conservative majority. That wave was in part a backlash to the construction of high-profile developments, many of them aimed at the student population.

And in this election, despite all that has occurred this year, the issue of development and housing affordability have again taken center stage.

But while the issue of development helped elect him in 2016, McCarthy said if he loses this year, it will be because of the same issues of “big buildings.”

In that same vein, dissatisfaction with large developments in the city might be the wind at the backs of newcomers, supported by some voters who simply want to see new faces in the city council chambers.

Those newcomers include Miranda Sweet, who owns and operates the downtown shop Rainbow's End, and Eric Nolan, who currently sits on the city’s Planning and Zoning Commission.

Also running for Council are Anthony Garcia, who grew up in Flagstaff and chairs the city’s Beautification Commission, and professional trail runner and director of strategy at Squirrel's Nut Butter Eric Senseman.

Finally, Becky Daggett, who has worked in leadership positions at several local organizations over the years including Friends of Flagstaff’s Future, Flagstaff Arts and Leadership Academy and the Flagstaff Arts Council, also threw her hat into the ring.

COVID and development

As candidates run for Council, this campaign season has looked very different than that of past years. With the pandemic preventing many in-person forms of campaigning, candidates have generally been turning to a mix of Zoom calls, social media posts and online forums to get their messages to voters.

That has kept candidates busy.

Garcia said he alone has close to 25 hours of recorded videos and streams in which he has taken part in this election cycle. Moreover, McCarthy said he thinks there has been more communication between the community and city council candidates and more, albeit virtual, campaign forums this year than past election seasons.

Challenges related to COVID-19 are also likely to be one of the first things candidates could be discussing if elected, and a topic that has been in the forefront.

For example, Sweet said responding to the virus and related economic downturn has become one of the things she has been thinking about the most. Sweet said for Council to address other issues such as affordable housing and climate change, it will need to ensure the city is on the financial footing to actually get that done.

“Look, I am all for affordable housing. I am all for carbon neutrality by 2030. That is how we should be making our decisions, is [looking at] what can we do to work towards those things. But really, the first priority is to get through this pandemic. It is not over,” Sweet said. “I am a mom with two boys in the FUSD school district. So right now, in this pandemic, I understand what families are going through.”

Sweet said she worries that her own business might not yet have experienced the worst of what this pandemic and downturn has to offer. Sweet said she has been pleased to see Council finding ways to help local businesses where they can, but if a spike in COVID-19 cases forces a second shutdown, Council may need to find more ways to help keep local businesses alive.

Several of the candidates said they believe the city and current city council have handled the crisis well and the city is in a better situation than one might have assumed in March. Daggett applauded the work by the city manager, as did McCarthy.

“And I think that the council, the city to this point, has handled it really well. But I do think that there are some challenging and difficult decisions that probably lie ahead of the council, and I feel very ready,” Daggett said.

The city has been in the “significant” stage of its recession plan since May, and staff told Council last month the city could see as much as $15 million less in revenue depending on how well the economy recovers.

Senseman said the crisis and potential drops in city revenue certainly mean a focus on supporting the city’s core services first and foremost, making sure the city has its basics covered before moving to address other issues.

Garcia echoed that sentiment and said for him, part of that will be protecting city staff and personnel from possible cuts as much as possible. He said it will be important to ensure the city has the workforce needed to keep up high-quality services, especially as staffing levels at the city still hadn’t reached the pre-Great Recession levels before the coronavirus hit.

And Nolan said he thinks the issue of COVID threatens to exasperate certain kinds of development issues and gentrification, especially if the downturn leads to the closures of local businesses.

“COVID has impacted small businesses. If they close their doors, I can guarantee you the larger corporations are going to be looking to fill that market space. So not only are we seeing gentrification in a residential sense, but we're also seeing it in a commercial sense,” Nolan said.

During his time with Planning and Zoning, Nolan has often found himself in the minority as the only dissenting vote against a new development or project that other commissioners believe meets the necessary qualifications.

Nolan said that is because he tries to look at developments through the lens of sustainability issues such as water and what the city can support.

Smart, green growth

“Sustainability limitations that we have right now, I think, are real. So I think the placement of certain developments really needs to be considered,” Nolan said.

But regarding new development, Nolan said unlike four years ago, he thinks far more people have an understanding of what Council is capable of and when state law supersedes them.

Garcia said he, too, has been thinking about the ecological and cultural impacts of development, especially when looking at how the built size of the city could grow by almost a third when JW Powell Boulevard is connected to Fourth Street and the surrounding area is developed.

Garcia said he would like to see the city engage developers about those environmental impacts of projects, including impacts to water supplies. Garcia acknowledged addressing those issues may not be something the city could enforce as part of a development process, but he said that is why it is important to build relationships with developers.

Senseman said the city should also create a more comprehensive plan to address issues of affordable housing and make sure it corresponds well with existing plans for city open space so the two issues are not in conflict.

“I think the problem we're facing is very much a case of not having a better plan in place now,” Senseman said. “I think we're feeling the effects of that lack of continuity and cohesion and comprehensiveness. And that's why you have these issues with Schultz Meadow.”

Daggett said as the campaign has gone on, the issue of affordable housing has only become more salient for her. She said she has always thought of it as a priority but she added that the more she has spoken to neighbors and residents and the more research she has done, the importance of addressing that issue has only grown in her mind.

But Daggett said that will mean developing places like the 3-acre Schultz Pass parcel.

“The planning that goes into what lands we want to protect and what are appropriate for development are really robust. And this parcel doesn't fall into that realm of something that the city wants to, you know, just shrug off half a million dollars and walk away from,” Daggett said.

McCarthy said one thing he has seen and practices on Council is when it is best to fight and when is it best to recognize that a fight is unwinnable.

It is often better to sit down and really negotiate to get the best deal for the city and its residents, McCarthy said, rather than give up that influence by purely opposing a project, only to see it built nonetheless.

For more information on the candidates, see the weekly answers to the Arizona Daily Sun's candidate questions, through which candidates have addressed issues from the future of policing to short-term rentals and how they hope to govern.