You wouldn't know it by all those screaming fliers in your mailbox, but there's actually a moderate running for Congress this year in Arizona.

She is Ann Kirkpatrick and she is running in our very own First Congressional District, which stretches from Flagstaff and the Rez down through the White Mountains to Casa Grande and the northern suburbs of Tucson.

Kirkpatrick is a Flagstaff Democrat, attorney and former prosecutor and state lawmaker who grew up on tribal lands in the White Mountains. She served in Congress in 2009-10, but her votes were hardly in lockstep with her party.

-- She voted for Obamacare and the federal stimulus, but not for the auto bailout, Dodd-Frank financial reform or cap-and-trade energy credits to address global warming.

-- She supports guns in national parks but not in college classrooms.

-- She's for raising taxes on those earning more than $500,000 but also for reining in Medicare spending.

-- She opposes mining for uranium in the Grand Canyon watershed but backs mining for copper outside Superior.

In other words, she incorporates parts of both the conservative and liberal agendas that make up the sprawling First District, a difficult balancing act that gives party hard-liners on both sides of the aisle fits.


For the Republican attack ad machine, Kirkpatrick doesn't present the usual liberal Democratic target. They've imported the same distorted national ad they use against anyone who voted for Obamacare as threatening Medicare and patient rights -- an ad thoroughly debunked by And they've focused on her office payroll, not exactly a defining issue in Campaign 2012.

For the Pelosi Democrats of northern Arizona and even some independents, Kirkpatrick's pragmatism makes her almost an exotic species that they don't know how to handle. They learned their lesson the hard way in 2010 when they stayed home instead of turning out for her election against Paul Gosar, a tea party Republican from Doney Park, and it cost the Democrats a seat in Congress.

But this year, with Gosar running in a different district and the Republicans fielding a candidate from the Tucson suburbs who has ignored northern Arizona, Kirkpatrick should have the field almost to herself. The fact that she can gain no traction with newspaper editorial boards in the southern half of the district says as much about their unfamiliarity with the district as it does about Kirkpatrick.


Her opponent, Republican Jonathan Paton, is a career lobbyist and politician who voted consistently with the right wing of the Republican Party during his terms in the Legislature. He voted for SB1070 and has refused to commit to comprehensive immigration reform until the border is secured according to benchmarks that he won't specify.

Kirkpatrick wants a secure border, too, but is willing to move forward on temporary work visas and Dream Act exemptions.

Paton says he is for quality education, but he opposed even putting the 1-cent sales tax for schools on the ballot, much less supported it.

Kirkpatrick wants full funding for Head Start and the federal Title I school programs for poor children.

Paton opposes Obamacare and any mandatory insurance plan, but he won't say how the U.S. healthcare system can reduce the number of uninsured other than to open up health insurance to interstate competition and back away from the fee-for-service health care model.

Kirkpatrick is open to amending Obamacare's payment schedules for physicians and strengthening incentives to get family doctors into rural areas.

Paton blames much of the economy's current ills on federal overregulation and intrusion into the free market.

Kirkpatrick says the government can and should play a role in stimulating emerging sectors like renewable energy and biotech.


In short, Paton strikes us as another rigid, free-market conservative who will not work across the aisle in Congress, where gridlock in the face of the looming fiscal cliff is no longer an acceptable option. The three big issues that Congress must face directly -- a growing federal debt, slack economic demand that is frustrating an entire generation of new college graduates, and the growing inequality between the haves and the have-nots -- are in tension with each other. They won't be solved without a mix of higher, targeted tax revenues, strategic spending cuts and government investment in areas that will prime the middle-class pump.

Ann Kirkpatrick has shown the courage and intelligence to weigh those competing priorities and support pragmatic solutions. That's good for a congressional district as diverse as CD1 and it is good for the country. We urge voters to return her to Congress on Nov. 6.

Serving this week on the Daily Sun's Editorial Advisory Board were Publisher Don Rowley, Editor Randy Wilson and citizen members John Lauc, Joyce R. Browning, Becky Daggett and Scott Kuhr.

Our View: CD1 needs an intelligent and pragmatic representative who embodies its diversity and will help to break the gridlock in Congress.

(7) comments


I am beside this endorsment in full capacity. Madame Kirkpatrick has well represented all of the people of Northern Arizona in her prior years of service.
I don't know much about Paton, but the ads that are delivered attacking Kirkpatrick's great person are at the least pathetic, un-American and disgraceful.


Moderate?? By whose standards? She brings Nancy Pelosi to AZ to campaign for her. She accepts SEIU money. Voting for more deficit spending is not my definition of Moderate.

In Paul's opinion

When an elected representative walks out on their constituents during a Town Hall Meeting, which she called for, then I'd say she is not the person we want to represent us. Also voting for something she didn't insist on reading first and can not justify later shows a lack of character. You might want to call these errors on her part RED FLAGS.


The Daily Sun has my respect for endorsing Ann Kirkpatrick. I did my own research on her record. I feel safer with Ann -- a moderate, independent thinker who has the heart and soul of the District, someone who grew up with ranchers, Navajo, Apache and rural folk -- not someone who moved here in order to run for office. She already proved the last time that she's not afraid to work across party lines to improve the lives and land of District 1. That's what we need here.


From the article:

Paton blames much of the economy's current ills on federal overregulation and intrusion into the free market.

Kirkpatrick says the government can and should play a role in stimulating emerging sectors like renewable energy and biotech.

That pretty much says it all right there. Do you want the our economy micro-managed by politicians or do you want it managed by the actions of millions of individuals spending their own money in order to maximize their own wellbeing?


We the people already fired her once - go away Ann, you had your chance!


Sorry, I voted for her before but will not now. Can't support her after her vote for Obamacare, this despite the fact that polls showed the majority of her constituents did not (and do not now) support it. Those other issues cited in the editorial are small potatoes compared to the widespread havoc Obamacare will wreak. Instead of representing the people, she buckled under to pressure from the DNC. Proves she lacks firm principles, doesn't truly know who she works for, and cannot be trusted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.