Sentence

Molester of child gets life

2012-10-04T05:00:00Z 2012-10-04T14:01:28Z Molester of child gets lifeERIC BETZ Sun Staff Reporter Arizona Daily Sun
October 04, 2012 5:00 am  • 

After two mistrials and finally a guilty verdict by a jury earlier this year, a Phoenix man accused of repeatedly molesting a young boy on fishing trips to the Flagstaff area has been sentenced to life in prison.

Stephen James Bruni, 46, who was living in the Phoenix area at the time, was convicted on one count of sexual conduct with a minor under the age of 12, a class 2 felony and a dangerous crime against a child. Arizona law requires the life sentence, with eligibility for parole only after 35 years have been served in prison.

The child molestation allegedly occurred on a family camping trip south of Flagstaff between July 22-24, 2008.

Bruni shared a tent with the child at the Woods Canyon Lake Campground south of Flagstaff, where prosecutors contend he molested the child multiple times between fishing outings.

Bruni allegedly told the child not to tell anyone, but the child didn't keep quiet about it.

According to a police report, the child had also accused Bruni of molestation several years earlier and relatives didn't believe him.

A trial in August 2011 ended in a hung jury after three jurors told Coconino County Superior Court Judge Mark Moran they couldn't come to an agreement with the remaining jurors. A previous trial in fall of 2010 was called off by the judge after evidence wasn't disclosed to the defense in a timely manner.

The defendant admitted to sexual conduct with the boy in a taped phone call set up by Coconino County Sheriff's Offices detectives after the child told family members about being molested.

In the phone conversation, the child's father told Bruni that the boy was seeing a counselor and having trouble discussing the molestation. The father said they needed to know what happened in order to help the child.

Bruni confessed in the call to certain sexual acts; however, the defendant maintained in court that he only made the statements under duress because he was scared of the boy's father, who had previously tried to fight him.

The boy's father had admitted to detectives that he lied to detectives about fighting with the defendant because the father didn't want to go back to prison.

Eric Betz can be reached at 556-2250 or ebetz@azdailysun.com.

Copyright 2015 Arizona Daily Sun. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. kismetkisser
    Report Abuse
    kismetkisser - October 30, 2012 1:28 pm
    Keep in mind this man was only found guilty on one account and not guilty on 3 accounts. And holmgard has a point, this is horrible that there is this double standard in this nation on how to deal with certain "crimes". And the judge probably did not admonish the child involved.
  2. holmgard
    Report Abuse
    holmgard - October 10, 2012 10:24 am
    The only thing more sickening than this man's behavior is the fact that a woman was recently found guilty of having sex with a minor, one of her students, and she was let out on probation. No jail time, no convicted/registered sex offender status for life, just a slap on the wrist and sorry to inconvenience you with our legal proceedings. But for the man: life in prison. Such double standards undermine any notion of our society's legal institutions allegedly being impartial and objective.
  3. Bob Swift
    Report Abuse
    Bob Swift - October 05, 2012 1:41 pm
    The same thought struck me. Thanks for stating it clearly.

    For how long should a "suspect" be accused of an "alleged" crime?

    I say only if (and until) he is convicted, at which moment he becomes a "perp who committed a crime."

  4. Sasquatch
    Report Abuse
    Sasquatch - October 04, 2012 2:28 pm
    no need for the allegedly, he was found guilty. I wonder if judge Hatch would have admonished the child to avoid fishing trips?
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick