Opinion
FUSD budget override deserves to be renewed
Our view: The school district has shown since 1994 that it can spend the extra $5.7 million a year wisely.Today is the last day to cast ballots for the FUSD budget override, and we urge district voters to turn in ballots marked "Yes."
It is easy to throw stones at how an 11,000-student public school district should be run. But it's far from easy to run any public educational enterprise in Arizona, given the restrictive local funding formulas and the underfunding by the Legislature. The result is a public spending level on education that ranks Arizona near the bottom of the 50 states. It is not only an embarrassment but completely unnecessary. Arizona is not a particularly high-tax state, and poll after poll has shown that voters want higher education spending -- or at least not as deep cuts during tough economic times.
An override of $45 for every $100,000 of a home's market value at least lets local voters exceed arbitrary budget limits that have little to do with either the educational need or the financial capacity of local residents to meet that need. More than a hundred Arizona school districts have taken advantage of the 10 percent override allowance, including FUSD back in 2004.
Now it is time to renew the override, and as we have noted in this space before (Editorial, Oct. 11, 2009), the district has delivered on its promise back then to keep class sizes relatively small, reduce the extracurricular "pay to play" fee, and support art, music, phys ed, librarians and school nurses. We have no reason to doubt that the district will continue to spend the extra $5.7 million a year on these worthwhile programs, which is why we urge a yes vote on the override.
Conversely, if the measure fails, we have every reason to believe that most of those programs will disappear, to the detriment of what a well-rounded public-school education should contain. Critics contend that the district could find the extra money if it closed some school buildings and cut administrators, but they offer no documentation for those claims. District voters have said in the past they support smaller, more numerous schools, but even if two or three were to close, the savings would not approach $5.7 million a year.
Completed, signed ballots must be received by 7 p.m. today in the white mailboxes at one of these locations:
-- Coconino County Elections, 110 E. Cherry Ave., Flagstaff
-- Coconino County Health Department, 2625 N. King St., Flagstaff
-- Coconino County Elections Tuba City Branch Office, Tuba City Library (basement)
Voters can also bring their ballots into the Cherry Avenue office and fill them out at voting booths.
On the Navajo Nation, elections workers will be at the Leupp Senior Center today to collect FUSD ballots and offer translation services.
If you need a replacement ballot, or have further questions about the elections, you can contact the Coconino County Elections office at (800) 793-6181 or (928) 679-7860. The elections office also has informational pamphlets online at www.coconino.az.gov/elections.
It's time to nominate your friends and neighbors for the Arizona Daily Sun's Citizen of the Year award. It comes in three categories: Man, Woman and Organization of the Year. The award recognizes someone who has made Flagstaff a better place in the past year as a volunteer, not in their line of work.
To make a nomination, send an e-mail to Publisher Don Rowley. Mail and faxes are OK, too, but please limit your nominating letters to one page. There's no application form to fill out. Nominators should simply say why they think a certain individual or group has made Flagstaff a better place to live because of their volunteer efforts.
Nominations in all three categories will be accepted through the day after Thanksgiving, Nov. 27, and winners will be announced in the newspaper at the turn of the new year. Judging will be done by a panel of previous winners and not by the Daily Sun.
Nominations can be mailed to the Daily Sun at 1751 S. Thompson St., Flagstaff, AZ 86001 or dropped off at the newspaper's office, care of the publisher, Don Rowley. The e-mail address is drowley@azdailysun.com. The fax number is 774-4790, and faxed nominations will be accepted. For more information, please call Publisher Don Rowley at 556-2240.
»Subscribe to the Arizona Daily Sun
Ads by Yahoo!
Super Cheap Car Insurance
Compare Multiple Car Insurance Quotes Online - Plans from $15 / Month
USInsuranceOnline.com
Readers' Favorites
Most commented stories
- FUSD mulls high school closures (62)
- Kirkpatrick to vote 'yes' on health care bill (51)
- Canyon camping reservations due changes (47)
- Labor pains at City Hall (45)
- Sledding proposal collapses (41)
- Unions for city OK'd (40)
- Snowbowl construction still in limbo (39)
- Few churches take up homeless cause (38)
- Due process being ignored in handling of Snowbowl's permit (36)
- 3 FUSD schools due closure? (36)
Leave your comments below:
sm wrote on Nov 3, 2009 12:08 PM:
" NO MORE TAXES
FUSD needs to deal with the new economy
You are hurting families Daily Sun by advocating more property taxes to the residents of this town just trying to hang on..... it's got to stop!!!!!!!
VOTE NO PLEASE "
FUSD needs to deal with the new economy
You are hurting families Daily Sun by advocating more property taxes to the residents of this town just trying to hang on..... it's got to stop!!!!!!!
VOTE NO PLEASE "
Stephen wrote on Nov 3, 2009 7:42 AM:
" The Daily Sun's position is: “so okay, the state legislature is dysfunctional and under funding schools but don’t get angry at them (that body is ruled by our buddies the Chamber of Commerce).” No! Get out your wallet and make up for the difference. Problem solved.” Duh! Throwing money at a problem will perhaps salve their conscience but will not provide schools that prepare our children for the 21st century. Nobody, including the editors of the Daily Sun, has any idea of what is going on in our schools but everybody has a point of view about it. All of which are based on whistling in the dark. A good new superintendent could perhaps get a handle on it but it would take years to weed out the old bad habits and bring in innovation and positive change. Don't get me wrong we have some great teachers in our schools but the FUSD school system undermines their dedicated efforts. "
Jess wrote on Nov 3, 2009 7:41 AM:
" The Sun never saw a tax it didnt support. This one is really being pushed. Makes me very suspicious. I voted NO. "
Common Man wrote on Nov 3, 2009 7:21 AM:
" I respectfully disagree with this editorial by the Daily Sun. You have it wrong. Yes, there are many worthwhile programs that may get if this over ride is not passed, however what part of over ride do you not understand? An extra $45/$100K doesn’t seem like a lot of money, but it is EXTRA, on top of what we already pay! To say a lot of other districts do it, is not a valid argument, and certainly does not make it right. Look, we passed this extra money for the schools in 2004 and were told that it would just be temporary. Now it has expired and we are again asked to over ride the budget. Why not just have a reasonable budget and not come back to the money trough every few years for more. I say NO more over rides. I say the FUSD needs to stick within its budget like the rest of us. If hard choices need to be made, then let’s make them and not continually live beyond our means or shift them on to some future generation. Perhaps closing one of the high schools would work. Perhaps the students will need to be in larger classes. Perhaps the parents should give more of both their time and money. Whatever the answer is, simply throwing more at the FUSD by this silly over ride system is NOT the answer. Join me in voting NO on this over ride issue and let’s force FUSD to come up with a more efficient ways to educate our kids. Our children know that their parents cannot continuously spend more than they take in. What kind of lesson will this teach our kids? Certainly not the kind of fiscal irresponsibility, which got us in this mess in the first place. It is time to wake up Flagstaff and face the new reality. "
All comments will be reviewed before being posted. Comments that contain profanity or are obscene, resort to name calling, are libelous in nature, or make personal attacks won’t be approved. Criticism should focus on the ideas or arguments presented — not the person.
Comments are not always reviewed immediately, especially when posted on weekends or nights.
We reserve the right to delete any comments that, upon further review, fail to meet our guidelines.
Do we edit user comments? No. The writers are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide.
Click to see the complete policy
Advertisement
News Photos Slide Show
Advertisements
Site Index
[ About Us |
Contact Us |
Job Opportunities |
Advertise |
Terms of use |
Privacy policy |
Legal Statement ]
The Arizona Daily Sun, Copyright 2009 © 1751 S. Thompson, Flagstaff, AZ
The Arizona Daily Sun, Copyright 2009 © 1751 S. Thompson, Flagstaff, AZ


work within your budget FUSD wrote on Nov 3, 2009 8:25 PM: