News
More layoffs at Southwest Windpower
Southwest Windpower is laying off a second round of employees this year after failing to meet sales goals.
Fifteen employees at the west Flagstaff wind turbine manufacturing, research and sales facility were informed Tuesday that they would no longer have jobs. They include two engineers and employees in human resources, production, electronics and quality control.
After 14 layoffs in March, the privately held business has now cut its Flagstaff workforce by more than one-third between the end of last year and this summer, going from an estimated 110 employees to 69.
It was exceeding sales from last year, but not meeting board-set targets, said CEO Frank Greco.
"The company's still strong, and sales are still coming in at slightly above the rate of last year, but not at the growth rate that we had anticipated," Greco said.
The company will continue producing all of the products it makes now for backyard and boat power generation.
Southwest Windpower opened a new sales office in Germany in January and benefited from recent tax credits reducing the cost of small wind turbines.
But the tax credits were not enough, said Greco. "I think we were counting on the stimulus package to have more effect sooner rather than later," he said.
The company has sales goals of about $3 million per month, said one source.
"These decisions weren't made easily, and they were made with all of the remaining employees' and company's best interests in mind," Greco said.
There are now internal questions about whether the company will remain in Flagstaff or move to Phoenix.
The company's current lease runs through March 2010, but Greco largely declined to answer questions on the topic of a move to Phoenix.
"There are no plans for that at the moment," he said.
Greco had previously hoped to rehire recently laid-off employees this summer (after a spike in hiring at the end of 2008), and said wind turbine sales were down globally but that he hoped for a summer rebound.
Cyndy Cole can be reached at 913- 8607 or at ccole@azdailysun.com.
»Subscribe to the Arizona Daily Sun
Ads by Yahoo!
Flagstaff Jobs
$30/Hour Work From Home Jobs.View Home Jobs Now! Computer Required.
National-News-Gazette.com
Readers' Favorites
Most commented stories
- Plea deal in abortion scuffle (300)
- FUSD budget override fails (83)
- From illuminated to eliminated (76)
- Student scofflaws now a Target (72)
- Big-city care driving FMC prices (63)
- Locals losing campus contracts (50)
- ADOT to cut plows (49)
- Tired from a tough hike? Rescuers fear Yuppie 911 (32)
- State suspends operations at 13 rest areas (30)
- Detox falling short (28)
Leave your comments below:
dissapointed wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:58 PM:
Diogenes wrote on Jul 10, 2009 11:37 PM:
Louie wrote on Jul 10, 2009 4:08 PM:
SWWP wrote on Jul 9, 2009 7:07 AM:
Tater wrote on Jul 8, 2009 9:56 AM:
Diogenes wrote on Jul 7, 2009 1:55 PM:
Dennis Mackeral wrote on Jul 6, 2009 7:02 PM:
flag girl wrote on Jul 6, 2009 1:36 PM:
Diogenes wrote on Jul 6, 2009 1:00 PM:
"Are SWP executives getting millions? "
You'd have to ask them that question, Tater. Bet they don't answer. That's because for a company that has been saying it hasn't made a profit since 1999, what the execs are getting paid would be an outrage. Southwest Windpower just got caught in a major lie regarding moving to Phoenix, which they were trying to keep quiet. And don't forget these execs have mucho stock options which is where the all-out drive to take the company public at all costs is coming from.
The fact is, none of this has anything to do with high taxes, labor costs, or any of the straw men being advanced here. It comes from the goal to take the company public and exercise those options and dump the problems into someone else's lap. Skystream was merely the means to that end. The goal wasn't Skystream, the goal was taking the company public.
CPA, if you are a CPA, I will look forward to the day your job gets outsourced. Experience is a great teacher. "
cpa wrote on Jul 6, 2009 11:48 AM:
" cpa said:
"Good luck with that attitude diogenes, you either get competitive or watch jobs be exported. Companies that can't compete on price aren't in business for long. "
So, you're saying Americans should work for communist wages? But execs should get millions of dollars in yearly salary? "
You're putting words in my mouth, I said absolutely nothing that supports unmerited executive compensation or even mentions communists wages, thats all you. Outsourcing is not restricted to just China or other communist countries, try looking south of the border.
What I am saying is that US wages are not competitive on a global basis, and business gravitates towards the cheapest labor markets. China is a leader in that regard. It does not matter what morality you apply to this notion, the fact is that it does and will continue to happen. Whining about outsourcing will not bring back or save existing US jobs, nor will it do anything to help maintain our current standard of living. If you don't like whats happening I suggest you start thinking about ways to reverse the trend, which means manufacturing costs in the US must go down, including labor which is typically the single largest expense. While I agree that a very good argument can be made for cutting executive pay, that alone will not make US companies competitive on a global scale. I suggest that you look beyond local circumstances for a better understanding of what we face as a country. "
Tater wrote on Jul 6, 2009 11:42 AM:
Are SWP executives getting millions? "
Wind Guy wrote on Jul 6, 2009 10:20 AM:
Diogenes wrote on Jul 5, 2009 4:20 PM:
"Good luck with that attitude diogenes, you either get competitive or watch jobs be exported. Companies that can't compete on price aren't in business for long. "
So, you're saying Americans should work for communist wages? But execs should get millions of dollars in yearly salary? "
cpa wrote on Jul 5, 2009 11:45 AM:
" CPA wrote:
"If we want to keep good manufacturing jobs in the US then we have to find ways to significantly lower costs, which I suspect will lead to a lower standard of living in our country. "
So, Americans should have the same living standards as communists, that's what you're saying, right? And all so the execs can live in mansions, right? Tell me more about this "land of opportunity"!
No, keeping manufacturing jobs in America means it should be illegal to export American jobs. Especially to communists. Period. "
Good luck with that attitude diogenes, you either get competitive or watch jobs be exported. Companies that can't compete on price aren't in business for long. "
AmericanMadeNow wrote on Jul 5, 2009 10:23 AM:
American corporations, out of greed, began moving thier manufacturing to China to garner higher profits on the back end by cheap labor. The Right, as per usual, justified this by saying "Get regulation out of business! Hands off business!" Basically, they viewed any restrictions or regulations on business as wrong. Bear in mind this is the same Right that is so virulently anti-communist that we can't buy cigars from Cuba and their standard tactic to win debates is by smearing the opponent as a "communist". However, they support shipping American industry to China, a communist country. This alone will cause us to lose a war with China (or any other still-industrialized nation) no matter how "pro-military" a president is. Once you lose a certain number of aircraft and armor, how do you replace it within a week without enough factories?
To keep Americans from noticing the decline in good jobs and stagnation of wages, the corporations began offering cheap goods from China, cheap food by ignoring food safety (e.coli 0157:H7 is a direct result of factory feedlot raising of beef which made beef cheap), and unlimited credit. To keep enough consumers buying products when the job base really didn't exist to provide such customers, they had to give credit to basically everyone. This is also what created the "mortgage crisis". People could buy houses who really couldn't afford them. But they still sold new 4 bedroom houses to age 20s couples with mediocre income anyway.
And this whole house of cards has finally fallen over and who gets blamed? Oh, it must be the workers for wanting too much money! It's higher taxes! Except none of that was ever trotted out during the heyday of the Cold War when during the 1960s a guy running a drill press at aerospace-defense plant earned enough to buy a house, a car or two, and his wife didn't work. As long as we were building weapons and the government was buying those weapons, no one cared what labor cost because the aircraft plants and munitions factories were making money hand over fist. Oh, but now corporations want to whine about labor costs, despite the fact those high-paid defense jobs are gone and have been for some time (and those defense job wages are gone also) and wages have not kept up with the cost of living. And that's another reason credit got so big. Wages haven't kept up with the cost of living and people lived on credit. That's how people survived the last few years of skyrocketing gasoline prices (and remember U.S. automakers sold everyone gas-guzzling SUVs just a year or two before that began) when the wages did not keep up with the rising cost of living. This is why this crisis hit right after these last few years of jacked-up gas prices. And just because people buy a lot of "stuff" is irrelevant. A lot of that "stuff" is cheap crap from China.
Now we had Obama touting "Green jobs, here in America". Well, he's asleep at the wheel here. The very first thing he needs to do is stop U.S. imports from China of manufactured goods. We can't afford it anymore. We need to roll the clock back and be self-sufficient again or we will not survive. Southwest Windpower is a local example of what happens. The company is run badly by execs without any real leadership skills and who gets blamed? The workers just doing the jobs those execs direct them to do. And so the execs use that as an excuse to use slave labor in China. And the Right laps that up like all the other propaganda they're spoon-fed by the defenders of this practice. The reality is, when it became very apparant that the execs at Southwest Windpower were making poor decisions and the company was failing, they should have been the first ones replaced. Instead, the people just doing their jobs suffered and lost their jobs and poor decisions will still continue because the people making them are still in power there. And so, later, more people will lose their jobs and the same execs will keep their jobs. Until the company finally goes out of business or files for bankruptcy. This is what's happening to American business. It's not the workers, labor costs, regulation, or taxes. It's the fact that execs still get paid millions of dollars even if they fail and Mommy Government comes and saves the company. It's the fact that execs see this pay as an entitlement and not a wage. It's the fact that American execs couldn't lead the way out of a wet paper sack. "
RG wrote on Jul 4, 2009 9:52 AM:
This is brutal and sad, but true. What do you expect to replace our once powerful industrial base which shifted to "financial services" which then burst wide open like a hot air balloon that someone cut a gaping hole in? We're never again going to invent value-less investments to keep the whole thing going. The emperor no longer has any clothes. "
Listen up wrote on Jul 2, 2009 10:45 PM:
Don't mean to be the bearer of bad news.
No job is safe and don't be relaxed at your job.
It doesn't matter anymore if you show up for work everyday, do your
very best and be a hard worker.....it just doesn't matter anymore.
I have known people that worked a job in this town for 10 years and got
fired for the least little thing. You have to have personality and if they don't
like you....you are gone just like that.
So anyway...... I think I will go back to school so i can have job security. "
Tater wrote on Jul 2, 2009 7:27 PM:
In this economy, business is tough for nearly everybody, but to be a player in an industry with the backing of a worldwide campaign shilling for them, politicians in their pockets, and enormous sums of public and private money to help develop and move their product, well. . . . . . .why isn't this company booming? "
Diogenes wrote on Jul 2, 2009 4:06 PM:
"If we want to keep good manufacturing jobs in the US then we have to find ways to significantly lower costs, which I suspect will lead to a lower standard of living in our country. "
So, Americans should have the same living standards as communists, that's what you're saying, right? And all so the execs can live in mansions, right? Tell me more about this "land of opportunity"!
No, keeping manufacturing jobs in America means it should be illegal to export American jobs. Especially to communists. Period. "
Diogenes wrote on Jul 2, 2009 1:55 PM:
This is why now 29 people have lost their jobs. Those 29 people paid the price. But I suspect that even if SWWP made the $3 million a month benchmark set by Frank, then Frank would have called for $4 million and used that to justify moving the offices to Phoenix and production to China. After all, why else are they laying off production people? "
Me wrote on Jul 2, 2009 1:23 PM:
No, taxes do not affect SWWP's bottom line because they do not pay any.
Allow me to explain. Businesses are able to deduct expenses on their tax return. I am a CPA, so I know how corporate tax returns are prepared. I am also a former employee, and friends/family with current ones, so I know their expenses exceed their revenues.
When a corporations' deductible expenses exceed their revenues, they have a net loss. Corporate taxes are levied on the net income of the business. If the corporation is not profitable, it does not pay taxes.
Check out www.irs.gov and Form 1120 if you would like to see for yourself how corporate taxes are calculated. "
insider wrote on Jul 2, 2009 10:58 AM:
I've read about the move to Phoenix, but has anyone even thought about, say, St. Louis, Denver or even California. "
Realist wrote on Jul 2, 2009 10:30 AM:
V wrote on Jul 2, 2009 10:12 AM:
Concerned with Flag wrote on Jul 2, 2009 9:58 AM:
Tater wrote on Jul 2, 2009 9:24 AM:
" To Anne - this company is not profitable, thus it does not pay taxes. This has nothing to do with our tax structure, nor the economy. This is a cover up for a strategic exit from Flagstaff. "
Does not pay taxes? Whats up with that? You think they just tell the tax man 'we had a bad year, go away'? You may be correct about the exit strategy, but you should at least acknowledge that taxes affect the bottom line and most certainly contribute to whether a company is profitable or not. "
cpa wrote on Jul 2, 2009 9:24 AM:
MasterBlaster wrote on Jul 1, 2009 10:27 PM:
'Readers, please ignore Diogenes diatribe. He is a disgruntled ex-employee.'
That is NOT a reasonable statement. It sounds reasonable, but it isn't. What that is, is spin.
The fact is that if he IS a disgruntled ex-employee, then he probably HAS a legitimate reason for being disgruntled.
Far from making his statements less valid, the fact that he is a disgruntled ex-employee lends MORE weight and validity to his statements. "
Jean wrote on Jul 1, 2009 9:08 PM:
Me wrote on Jul 1, 2009 7:41 PM:
Diogenes wrote on Jul 1, 2009 6:45 PM:
Phil McCracken wrote on Jun 30, 2009 6:10 PM:
" ...don't let them fool you. Southwest is going to move it's entire production to China and it's offices and warehouse to Phoenix. Sad..... "
Who is "them", Phil? What, Southwest Windpower is just going to do this without Frank's knowledge? We should "wish him the best"?! This is exactly why Americans continue to lose jobs. They just suck it up and take it without a peep. And even defend the execs doing it, as you are doing Phil. I am guessing you can't make up your mind which side you're on, Phil. You criticized Southwest earlier and even said they were trying to "fool" the people. Then you criticized them again here. And now you defend the exec making the decision you so obviously disliked. Pick a side, Phil. You either support the workers losing their jobs or you don't.
Anne, nice try, but you're wrong. Taxes are not why Southwest is having these problems. Very poor decisions made by upper management are why they're having these problems. They think Chinese production will bail them out. Sorry, Anne, but supporting taking American jobs to a communist country means you support communists in my book. "
Anne wrote on Jul 1, 2009 3:17 PM:
Why is everything made in China cheaper????? US Taxes on businesses small and large are passed on to the consumer. Until the U.S. Govt limits burdensome taxes on the small businessman and corporations, production will continue to go overseas. "
BrandX wrote on Jul 1, 2009 1:23 PM:
Joe Sweet wrote on Jul 1, 2009 12:13 PM:
I looked at the website http://www.windenergytruth.com and saw a windmill laying on the ground after it fell off the pole. Build a better product and build it HERE in Flagstaff! "
Phil McCracken wrote on Jul 1, 2009 10:10 AM:
Diogenes wrote on Jul 1, 2009 9:51 AM:
I'm sorry, but Americans have gotten too used to losing their jobs to overseas and just walking away. People need to speak up and speak out. "
Online editor wrote on Jul 1, 2009 9:19 AM:
Phil McCracken wrote on Jul 1, 2009 8:53 AM:
This has been a long time coming for Southwest Windpower. Starting early last year the over ambitious sales projections led everyone to believe that it would never end. They had a record year last year, but it was too ambitious to maintain especially the way Southwest spent money. Unfortunately the employees paid the dearest price. They lost their jobs, their families suffer and worst of all they lost the heart and emotion and sweat and love they put into their jobs there.
For many months now it has been obvious from the inside that Southwest would move out of Flag. Production will move overseas, the administration will move to Phoenix.
Sad, sad, sad..... "
Diogenes wrote on Jul 1, 2009 7:11 AM:
Matthew Quigley wrote on Jul 1, 2009 7:06 AM:
All comments will be reviewed before being posted. Comments that contain profanity or are obscene, resort to name calling, are libelous in nature, or make personal attacks won’t be approved. Criticism should focus on the ideas or arguments presented — not the person.
Comments are not always reviewed immediately, especially when posted on weekends or nights.
We reserve the right to delete any comments that, upon further review, fail to meet our guidelines.
Do we edit user comments? No. The writers are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide.
Click to see the complete policy
News Photos Slide Show
Top Jobs
Branch Manager
Blair Worldwide
Consultants
Flagstaff Preferred
Salespeople
High tech dental practice
Dental Hygenist
Mack Corporation
Ofc Mngr/Bookkeeper
New Generation
Fun Travel Job
Praxair Healthcare Services
Client Care Assoc
Southern California Water Dist
Millwright/Mechanic
Unspecified
CAD drafter
Unspecified
Opto-tech engineer
The Arizona Daily Sun, Copyright 2009 © 1751 S. Thompson, Flagstaff, AZ


A. Nonymous wrote on Jul 27, 2009 1:56 PM: